one million words's picture
By: one million words, Pete Jahn
Jul 08 2010 1:30am
5
Login or register to post comments
2370 views


The Value of Old Cards

I am playing out "The Ultimate Standard Tournament" over on SCG.  It's a 32 deck single elimination tournament with thirty two of the best / most broken decks of all time.  The rule was that the deck had to be played to a good finish by a known player - but I was looking for the most famous archetypes of all time.  A lot of people contacted me and commented in the forums, and the final list had almost 70 serious contenders, which I cut down to 32.  (No, I'm not going to rehash that culling process.)

Here are the 32 decks that made the cut. 

1. NecroPotence - Brian Wiessman {no sideboard}
2. Rec / Sur (Brian Seldon, Worlds) *
3. Cuneo Blue (Randy Buehler, Worlds 1998)*
4. Covetous Wildfire (Kai Budde, Worlds 1999) *
5. Deadguy Red (Rubin, Worlds 1998)
6. Tolarian Blue (Chris Warren IL States version) *
7. Sabre Bargain (Jon Finkel, Masters 2000)*
8. Napster (Jon Finkel, US Nats 2000) *
9. Tinker (Jon Finkel, Worlds 2000) *
10. Replenish (Tom Van de Logt, Worlds 2000) *
11. Angry Hermit (Aaron Forsythe, US Nats 2000) *
12. Brawler Ponza (Sean McKeown, Grinders, 2001)
13. Fires (Zvi, PT Chicago 2000)*
14. Squirrel Opposition (Eugene Harvey, US Nats 2002) *
15. Tog (Carlos Romao, Worlds 2002)*
16. Goblin Bidding (Wolfgang Eder, Worlds 2003)*
17. UG Madness (David Humphries, Worlds 2003) *
18. Astral Slide (Gabe Walls, U.S. Nats, 2003)*
19. Skullclamp Affinity (Go Anan deck / Shuuhei Nakamura, Japan Nats.) *
20. Ghazi Glare (Katsuhiro Mori, Worlds 2005) *
21. Dragonstorm (Mihara, Worlds 2005)
22. Faeries (Paulo Vitor Damo da Rosa, Hollywood 2008) *
23. Jund (Owen Turtenwald, GP DC)
24. Doran (Yann Massicard, GP: Seattle)
25. 5 color Control (Gabriel Nassif, PT Kyoto)
26. Chapin 5CB
27. Boss Naya (LSV, PT San Diego) *
28. Mythic Conscription (Nakoi Nakada - GP Manilla)
29. Super Friends (Carlos Romao - GP DC)
30. Next Level Bant (Brian Kibler, GP: Sendai)
31. Corrupter Black (Jacob Selmur, Worlds 1999)- Adrian Sullivan
32. Stompy (Matt Linde, Worlds 1999)

A few years ago, I did the same thing with 32 Extended decks.  I played all of those matches out in paper, since my MTGO collection - at that time - was very shallow, and since most of the cards from most of the decks were not available online.  Back then, many of the chosen Extended decks had dual lands, and MTGO did not.  Now, things are a bit different.  

The 32 Standard decks fall into three basic categories:  not online, online and I have it, and online but I'd need cards.  When it is possible to play these old decks online, playing online is >> trying to find opponents for paper matches.  

BTW - if anyone wants to help play these matches out, the decklists to be used, and the pairings, can be found here.   I will, when I'm online and not drafting, be in the "UST" room.  Just type "/join UST" and look me up.  Check out the brackets, though, before you start putting your deck together.  A few matches have already been played out, and a few online decks have round one pairings against decks that are not online.   For example, Super Friends is on the list, but it was paired against Angry Hermit (which is not online) and it lost.  Super Friends is eliminated.

The following decks are not playable online, because they rely on cards that are not yet released.  In most cases, they have cards from Urza's Destiny or Mercadian Masques, but a few need other cards.  The Academy deck needs Mana Vault, which was in the Fifth Edition Core Set.  Anyway, these decks are not playable online:

4. Covetous Wildfire (Kai Budde, Worlds 1999)
6. Tolarian Blue (Chris Warren IL States version)
7. Sabre Bargain (Jon Finkel, Masters 2000)
8. Napster (Jon Finkle, US Nats 2000)
9. Tinker (Jon Finkel, Worlds 2000)
10. Replenish (Tom Van de Logt, Worlds 2000)
11. Angry Hermit (Aaron Forsythe, US Nats 2000)
12. Brawler Ponza (Sean McKeown, Grinders, 2001)
11. Fires (Zvi, PT Chicago 2000)13. Fires (Zvi, PT Chicago 2000)
31. Corrupter Black (Jacob Selmur, Worlds 1999)- Adrian Sullivan
32. Stompy (Matt Linde, Worlds 1999) (maindeck is playable)

The next group of decks are modern decks, but ones that require a playset of Jace, the Mind Sculptor or Gideon Jura, or Vengevines.  These are decks that are perfectly playable, but that I don't have the cards for (yet), and can't afford to simply buy.  I don't have the spare cash to splurge on playsets of Mythics, at least not while I still have dozens of packs to draft away.   Whatever - here are the modern decks I can't yet afford.

28. Mythic Conscription (Nakoi Nakada - GP Manilla)
29. Super Friends (Carlos Romao - GP DC)
30. Next Level Bant (Brian Kibler, GP: Sendai)

I'm hoping someone can bring these decks to the UST room so I can play against someone elses's version.  

That leaves the more interesting set of decks - the decks that were once good, but have rotated out.  In many cases, these decks are cheap.  However, with the revision of Extended, it is pretty clear that they are not playable in Extended, Classic or Legacy.  The question is whether there is any point in collecting these cards. 

Let's look the first such deck: 

Back in the day, you had decks like this - decks with almost no rares.  The Rare count is basically two City of Brass.  I already had most of the commons, from various Pauper games, and a few cards that were used in other decks (e.g. Careful Study was used in Dredge.)  To complete this deck, I needed the Wonders, the Arrogant Wurms, the Quiet Speculations and odd lots like Envelop and Stupefying Touch.  Total cost of the dozen or so cards I needed to complete the deck - a little over two bucks at MTGOTraders.  I bought - plus some other stuff.  (Actually, I bought a lot, including a Jace and a Gideon.  The total was a bit more than two bucks.)

As it happened, I logged on, collected my cards and went to the UST room.  I was met by a player who wanted to play Dragonstorm in the UST, so UG Madness was immediately valuable.  However, outside of silliness like the UST, how useful will these cards ever be?  They clearly are not an investment.  They are relatively common cards from a semi-recent block, and are only useful in decks that abuse a mechanic that is unlikely to ever be reprinted.  But maybe that's an over-generalization.  Let's look further.

First of all, the Cities of Brass.  Back when I bought them, they were not an investment expected to grow in value over the long haul.  They were tools.  They were critical components of decks that I was playing at the time.  I bought them to play, and kept them because I have two fundamental rules about selling cards.  1) Never sell lands.  (online, that is modified to keep a playset of every land.)  and 2) Never sell on a declining market.  I do sell spares, but I don't like to sell out at the end of the season, as prices fall like a rock.  If people are offering me fractions of a ticket per card, I'll keep them.  Most of the time, those cards will never be worth anything, ever, but every so often a combo deck using one of the cards appears, or the card is reprinted, and the value soars. 

Circular Logic is likely to be playable in various decks in the future.  Various effects let you Madness it out, but it is a decent three casting cost counter in other situations.  Circular Logic is also playable in Tog decks, and it is just barely possible that Tog will become Legacy playable again.  For these reasons, Circular Logic still has some value.  It accounts for a fair amount of the $2.75 cost of the UG Madness cards.  

Wonder is fun in semi-casual EDH and Commander decks, and I played it in my 5color / Prismatic deck years ago.  However, I rarely want more than one or two copies, so I suspect buying four to complete the deck was partly a waste.  On the other hand, Wonder is a card that might be reprinted in a base set someday, at which point the old versions will regain some value.

Cards like Envelop almost look like they might have some value.  At first glance, you might see how they could find a niche in Legacy or Vintage, but on a second look, it is hard to see how Envelop could ever make the cut over Spell Pierce or Disrupt - both of which are better one mana counters.  However, sometimes cards such as these see play is certain narrow situations.  It's often worth a few cents to have the options available, before they become "tech" and the price quadruples.  (Although, in this case, quadrupling the price would bring it all the way to $0.12.)

Finally, Arrogant Wurm is a creature.  My rule on lands is "never trade them away."  My rule on creatures is "if it's name doesn't start with "Tarmo" and end with "goyf," it will not keep any value.  As soon as creatures leave Standard, or now the new Extended, their value crashes.  My plan, for recent sets, has been to play enough limited to get playsets of  all the commons and uncommons, most of the rares and what Mythics I can, then buy the ones I really like.  I will sell high-value creatures early on, assuming I am not playing them in a deck, and buy them back later, after they rotate, if I want to play them casually.  As a rule, creatures just do not hold value.

Let's look at another deck:

 

A couple years ago, I played a RW Martyr of Sands deck that used many of these cards.  I have a couple Eternal Dragons, one Exalted Angel and most of the lands.  I need more Angels, more Dragons and the cycling cards.  The investment needed to finish this deck is way more than $2.50.  Way more.  My question is whether I would ever want to play Slide decks again.  I'm really uncertain on that front.

Slide is almost playable in Legacy, now.  I see a Slide deck doing well every so often in a Legacy or Classic DE.  Slide could also be good if the rumors of a new, Mercadian Masques forward format ever prove true.  If so, buying the cards now, while demand is low, could make a lot of sense.  Provided I wanted to try playing Slide.

However, right now, I am going to pass.  In the UST, Slide is paired against Napster in round one.  I don't know how that will turn out, but I do know that Napster is not available online.   I will be playing that match out in paper.  The winner of the Slide/Napster match will be playing the winner of Brawler Ponza - a fast land destruction deck - against a Reflecting Pool based 5 color control deck.  Ponza should win, and Ponza is not online.  If I need Slide online, it won't be for a couple weeks, so I will wait.

I did buy the cards to complete these decks.

15. Tog (Carlos Romao, Worlds 2002)*
19. Skullclamp Affinity (Go Anan deck / Shuuhei Nakamura, Japan Nats.) *
20. Ghazi Glare (Katsuhiro Mori, Worlds 2005) *
21. Dragonstorm (Mihara, Worlds 2005)
22. Faeries (Paulo Vitor Damo da Rosa, Hollywood 2008) *
23. Jund (Owen Turtenwald, GP DC)
24. Doran (Yann Massicard, GP: Seattle)
25. 5 color Control (Gabriel Nassif, PT Kyoto)
26. Chapin 5CB
27. Boss Naya (LSV, PT San Diego) *

In nearly every case, I already had most of the cards.  In a few cases, cards overlapped (e.g. the Circular Logics completed both UG Madness and Tog, and almost completed Squirrel Opposition.)  In others, the cards were either cheap (like UG Madness), or I had everything but the lands.  In Doran, for example, I had everything except a Twilight Mire (I had traded away a foil - my fourth copy), and wanted to recreate the playset.

There are advantages to playing a lot of limited, and keeping playsets of pretty much everything.

Here are a few deck I have not been able to get together.

 

This one is pretty simple.  I was not online back when Onslaught was being opened.  Goblins has always been a solid deck, ever since, so Goblins have never been cheap.  As a result, I need pretty much every rare in the deck.  I can't afford that - not for an archetype I have never much liked.  I'm just hoping that someone shows up in /join UST with a Bidding deck, so I can play against it.  I can't afford to buy it. 

I actually broke down and bought the Survivals a while back.  However, I have only one Recurring Nightmare and just one Undiscovered Paradise.  If I had a spare $100 for cards, I'd get a Jace II first.  A playset of (Recurring Nightmare) is way down the list.  This was a great Survival deck, back in its day, but even if I play Survival in Legacy, I would never need four Recurring Nightmares.

This one I plan on buying.   I have most of the maindeck, but I haven't forced myself to buy sideboard stuff like Jade Leech. Once again, the Circular Logics are coming through, and most of the other cards are relatively inexpensive.  Upheaval and Call of the Herd are so cheap!  I remember playing these decks, back in the day, and paying well over $20 apiece for the paper versions of these cards.  In any case,  Squirrel Opp's matchup against Chapin 5color Blood is one I would really prefer to play out online.  We will see.

Looking at the cards more closely, the deck has a lot of classic cards.  The painlands are not all that useful anymore - Wizards has printed a lot of multicolored lands that are far better  than the old painlands.  On the other hand, my "never trade lands" policy means I have them anyway.  Most of the other cards are must haves - either because they are classic staples (e.g. Birds of Paradise), staples because they do something  unique  (e.g. Squirrel Nest and Opposition), or are cards that came in sets I had to buy for other reasons (e.g. Flametongue Kavu was in the Jace vs. Chandra set that was the only online source for Daze.)

Finally, one last deck.

Stompy
Matt Linde, Worlds, 2001
Creatures
4 Albino Troll
4 Elvish Lyrist
4 Llanowar Elves
4 Pouncing Jaguar
4 River Boa
2 Uktabi Orangutan
4 Wild Dogs
26 cards

Other Spells
4 Cursed Scroll
4 Rancor
4 Giant Growth
12 cards
Lands
14 Forest
4 Gaea's Cradle
4 Treetop Village
22 cards

Pouncing Jaguar

 

This is a very cheap deck.  It contains cards like Giant Growth!  I have nearly the entire deck online.  (Okay, Thran Foundry is Urza's Destiny, but also irrelevant in the UST.)   All I really need are two more Gaea's Cradles.  However, I am sitting on a small pile of Urza's Saga and Urza's Legacy packs, waiting for the NIX TIX draft queues.  I also expect to play a bunch of Urza's block Limited once Urza's Destiny appears online.  I'm hesitant to buy the last two Cradles until I see if I can open them.  I will also wait to see whether Stompy can beat Sabre Bargain - a solid combo deck from back in the day.  I'll bang the paper decks together, first, and buy the Cradles when and if Stompy gets into a match that can be played online.

Someday, I will have the Cradles.  They are just a whole lot of fun.  If you have never played decks like Angry Hermit or Stompy, you have no idea.  

For me, the Cradles have value because I will put them into fun and casual decks.  However, they may well have monetary value due to be played in Legacy.   Maybe.  On the other hand, most old cards have potential value because they could be reprinted.  Gaea's Cradle is on the restricted list, meaning that it will never been be reprinted. 

For me, Cradles have value because I want them.  In the end, that's all that matters.  Moreover, speaking as a professional economist, the summation of the valuation of cards across all buyers defines value, so that is still all that matters.

Once again, I will be hanging out in the UST room, and looking for opponents.  I just won't be online much this weekend.  I'll be attending / running paper M11 prereleases.

PRJ

"one million words" on MTGO

7 Comments

Funny a lot of these decks by Paul Leicht at Thu, 07/08/2010 - 02:18
Paul Leicht's picture

Funny a lot of these decks remind me of OTHER pros like Squirrel Prison by Mikey P (he developed the original deck and did pretty well with it if memory serves.) Also what about Kibler Rith? Was that in the 70? No rock varients made the list? (Rec/Sur doesn't count really.)

Btw I do not believe the reserved list is guaranteed. Just because it seems so does not make it so. The only way to know for sure is to wait and wait and wait and see that it isn't being broken or reversed in some manner.

Interesting article. In general I do not read Star City articles much because a) some articles are unavailable to non-premium members and b) the site is still hideous after all these years, and c) The Ferret no longer edits for the site. So I missed any mention of this prior to this article. I am curious what spurred you to do it and what is the eventual purpose? Just for fun? Is there some study going on?

I agree about the point of by StealthBadger at Thu, 07/08/2010 - 08:06
StealthBadger's picture

I agree about the point of buying old decks. The old onslaught/Mirrodin w/g slide deck is probably my favourite deck of all time, but is there really any point me buying it? It's not competitive in any format (and even if i pimp it out to be legacy legal, it won't be competitive), but nobody seems to like playing against "real" decks in the casual room, so it's just going to be a deck which I love, but can't really play. Especially annoying as eternal dragons and eternal witnesses are both pricey.

Fantastic article, and even by deluxeicoff at Thu, 07/08/2010 - 14:07
deluxeicoff's picture
5

Fantastic article, and even better resource.

White Weenie by speks at Thu, 07/08/2010 - 14:23
speks's picture

From a archtype perspective, I think Dead Guy Red and Brawler Ponza are very similar decks, I would even go so far as to put Covetous Wildfire into that same category.
Napster and Corrupter Black are also very similar, using similar discard, threats, and Yawgmoth's Will.
And Nassif's 5 color control and Chapin 5CB are definitely too similar, I really had to strain to find a some differences there.

By my count, you have 3 mono-red decks (Dead Guy Red, Brawler Ponza, Covetous Wildfire) and 1 almost mono-red deck (Goblin Bidding). 3 mono-blue decks (Cuneo Blue, Tolarian Blue, Tinker). 3 mono-black decks (NecroPotence, Napster, Corrupter Black). 1 mono-green deck (Stompy). and 0 mono-white decks.

I really think White Weenie deserved a spot in these final 32, not only for diversity's sake, but it actually deserves a spot. White Weenie has been such a serious contender for so long throughout the history of Magic, winning regionals, nationals and pro tours. Some memorable ones were Pro Tour New York/Pro Tour Lin Sivvi 2000 (Masques Block Constructed) where 6 of the top 8 decks where mono-white rebels and Pro Tour Chicago 2000 (Standard) where Kai Budde's aggro rebels splash green faced off vs Kamiel Cornelissen's counter-rebels in the finals.

Competitive White Weenie decks throughout history includes Tithe+Empyrial armor during Mirage, Shadow+En-Kor+Cursed Scroll during Tempest, Waylay+Crusade aka White Lightning during Urza's, infamous Rebels during Masques, Punisher White during Onslaught, Kithin during Lorwyn and many many more.

So is it too late now to replace one of these similar decks with a white weenie deck? Most matches hasn't started yet, so its not too late!

In / not in: Rock: Rock and by one million words at Fri, 07/09/2010 - 08:36
one million words's picture

In / not in:

Rock: Rock and his Millions was in. It got split. Angry Hermit does the Squirrels and Hermits better, and Corrupter Black and Napster do the LD and discard better.

White Weenie: Kithkin mad the almost in list. Old Empyrial Armor decks are just not good enough. I know - I have a complete copy of the World Champs white weenie build together, and played it against some modern decks. Close, but no cigar. Straight beatdown decks from back when creatures were garbage are almost all underpowered. I included Stompy simply because it had Gaea's Cradle. The Goblins build has Patriarch's Bidding, etc. I wanted decks that did unusal things. Beatdown is not unusual - not powerful enough.

BTW - no block decks, no extended decks. Standard only.

Paul: It's because I'm curious. I was wondering whether modern decks were really better, or just different. Besides, I like playing around with old decks and archetypes, and people liked the Extended version of this tournament.

I dunno about that Derranged by Paul Leicht at Fri, 07/09/2010 - 09:39
Paul Leicht's picture

I dunno about that Derranged Hermit >> Squirrel's Nest imho. Particularly in the standard it was in, facing ponza and other land destruction decks. Yavimaya Elder was also key in that deck if I recall correctly. Helped get over the 5cmc hump.

==EDIT== For some reason I translated Angry Hermit into the Squirrel Position deck above which is just inferior imho to either.

Looking at a deck list from that time in an article by BDM on Aaron F's version I realized that this deck was not Squirrel Prison at all, but a ponza deck with added hermits and masticores.

I vaguely remember that deck or a similar one played at Neutral Ground but I still stand by the notion that Mikey P's Squirrel Prison was just better for its time. I had no problems running that deck to a first place finish at a Grudge Match Qualifier at Neutral Ground and afterward did well in other local tourneys with it.

Might the ravnica-era Boros by StealthBadger at Fri, 07/09/2010 - 09:37
StealthBadger's picture

Might the ravnica-era Boros deck have been a good "white-weenie"? Iseem to remember it being absolutely everywhere for a while.