I have to say that I love the fungal behemoth deck. Interestingly, there were a couple of similar decks over on the mothership a few years back. Both went with a blue splash though for extra grafty creatures. And I remember that both were a blast to play too!
Excuse that first post. But anyway, for Round 1, versus Shadowkrux, the word "vagility" is used. I trust your definition, so I haven't looked it up. Just thought I'd say that it's a funny word.
Me, I don't care about any of these cards, not even the ones I dimly remember playing a lifetime ago. But I'll carry on reading this series as long as you continue to write with wit and humour beyond the ken of most nerds/geeks.
There. Let's see if you can do it under pressure...
After last week's introduction, this was the last thing I expected for article #1. I love these quirky early Magic oddities. There are a few Tarmogoyfs and Ionas I'd like to blow up with a Chaos Orb.
My problem isn't the bugged cards themselves but how after so much time working, suddenly they stop working (and both exemples happen when the cards became more important than they had been for quite some time).
Doomgape is most definately a great card for gluttony; as a matter of fact Doomgape IS the definition of gluttony (read the flavortext)!
I don't think I will play Jund for any of the future articles. Everyone knows how it works and no one will find my article about Jund useful and/or interesting. All the comments would be something like this: "So, you wrote that many words and basically all you say is that Jund is good. Shocking!"
Therefore I will stay away from Jund.
Envy is hard I must admit, but I think I've found something. No decklist yet but just a sheer idea. And most probably it will be the last sin I will write about because I need time to work on it.
What a great tool, it now means I can play around with my decks at work whilst everyone thinks i'm attempting some complicated calculations to increase profit margins, when all I'm really doing is trying to build a successful Pauper Milling deck! (by the way any suggestions would be helpful).
Great work now going to work is not a complete waste of time!
Man I miss Contract From Below...When I started magic, it was ONLY an ante game - and this card single-cardedly (I know this isn't a word) won me most of my early collection. I've played ante a few times online, but it's no mystery, most losers don't pay up after losing...I haven't done so in probably 3 years, any idea if /join ante is still valid for those?
I am slightly confused. Why not just use MTGO offline? You can run MTGO_NET from the MTGO program directory, and it will use the collection you last logged in with, and let you edit and build decks right in the client, with the legality filters there and everything. I suppose this would have been really useful for the times when the filters did not work right, but they all work now.
Guess I don't "Anonymous"
Do you know the difference between "match" and "game" ?
nice i hadn't seen those, the kudzu is a nice add maybe instead of the spiders
Yeah, Pirate tribal desperately needs those, else we're stuck with three pirates and changelings until Mercadian Masques.
sorry, thought there were 4 vigor in the deck, not 3
Most are so rare they're not too dictionary friendly...but they are words. Simply googled "Big words starting with V" to get started :)
I have to say that I love the fungal behemoth deck. Interestingly, there were a couple of similar decks over on the mothership a few years back. Both went with a blue splash though for extra grafty creatures. And I remember that both were a blast to play too!
Here are the links if you're interested...
10 Decks in 10 Weeks: Fungal Behemoth (U/G)
http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/bb144
Double Mayhem
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/bb87
This is why I liked playing 5-color, its a player made format that plays ante and has Chaos Orb legal
yeah it can really get going quick, glad to hear you found a successful
http://pdcmagic.com/gatherling/deck.php?mode=view&id=10957
For a pauper milling deck, 1st and second in the std pauper last week
Excuse that first post. But anyway, for Round 1, versus Shadowkrux, the word "vagility" is used. I trust your definition, so I haven't looked it up. Just thought I'd say that it's a funny word.
For Round
Me, I don't care about any of these cards, not even the ones I dimly remember playing a lifetime ago. But I'll carry on reading this series as long as you continue to write with wit and humour beyond the ken of most nerds/geeks.
There. Let's see if you can do it under pressure...
Not allowed to install MTGO on company provided laptop.
Doh!!!! I had a deck I had been playing with, but decided to bump it to a later article.
Doh!!!! I had a deck I had been playing with, but decided to bump it to a later article.
After last week's introduction, this was the last thing I expected for article #1. I love these quirky early Magic oddities. There are a few Tarmogoyfs and Ionas I'd like to blow up with a Chaos Orb.
and good idea for a series, although I can't help thinking that it might drag a bit as you get towards the end of the 1020.
"#800-1020 - The crappy vanilla Portal I and II creatures. Yeah, whatever."
Actually, I do wants me some Talas flying pirates.
My problem isn't the bugged cards themselves but how after so much time working, suddenly they stop working (and both exemples happen when the cards became more important than they had been for quite some time).
Doomgape is most definately a great card for gluttony; as a matter of fact Doomgape IS the definition of gluttony (read the flavortext)!
I don't think I will play Jund for any of the future articles. Everyone knows how it works and no one will find my article about Jund useful and/or interesting. All the comments would be something like this: "So, you wrote that many words and basically all you say is that Jund is good. Shocking!"
Therefore I will stay away from Jund.
Envy is hard I must admit, but I think I've found something. No decklist yet but just a sheer idea. And most probably it will be the last sin I will write about because I need time to work on it.
Thanks for the comment.
LE
What a great tool, it now means I can play around with my decks at work whilst everyone thinks i'm attempting some complicated calculations to increase profit margins, when all I'm really doing is trying to build a successful Pauper Milling deck! (by the way any suggestions would be helpful).
Great work now going to work is not a complete waste of time!
Man I miss Contract From Below...When I started magic, it was ONLY an ante game - and this card single-cardedly (I know this isn't a word) won me most of my early collection. I've played ante a few times online, but it's no mystery, most losers don't pay up after losing...I haven't done so in probably 3 years, any idea if /join ante is still valid for those?
Few broken links, but overall...good read -
Much ado about nothing...
Built the second deck. Its pretty vicious. Quest for Gemblades fits pretty well
I am slightly confused. Why not just use MTGO offline? You can run MTGO_NET from the MTGO program directory, and it will use the collection you last logged in with, and let you edit and build decks right in the client, with the legality filters there and everything. I suppose this would have been really useful for the times when the filters did not work right, but they all work now.