I'm glad you're paying attention. You are correct in that there are 16 Myojin listed, 4 short of a Spirit tribal. You'll also note that, under the 'Divine Foliage' heading, there are 4 Verdant Eidolons, bringing us up to the 20 spirits we need.
As an aside, I find it amusing that the PureMTGO card graphics display Ekundu Cyclops as a Cyclops and Hulking Cyclops as a Giant. One of the clearest advantages of the online over the paper game is the cards of whatever version always being up to date with the latest errata.
I never thought about that one, simply because I never owned or played that one.
Well, the only downside with him would be that the deck must be completly rebuild to work with him, since it won't reach threshold fast enough in this version.
Good old Power Conduit. A mainstay in my Phoenix deck, interesting take in removing age counters. Primal Forcemage deck on the cheap is quite impressive, though I might like to point out a nice little Torment uncommon, Centaur Chieftain, one of the few pre-PLC green cards with haste, with a great mini-overrun threshold kicker.
Constant quality is one of your best points, and I liked to lose versus the cyclops one, even when I was pretty short on mana. Kavus.. well, I was going to build that one myself as soon as possible Flying blue fat is always apealing, too. .
Hi, nice article. I don't think grammar errors are so terrible, i think the contents of the article are the biggest problem: the deck is nice and cool, but i don't think it is really a fun deck; it abuses one of the most known comboes of mtgo and two ultra powerful rare cards: the zombie is playable almost with everything, destroy something, mill someone, make someone discard... no way, if they has not a removal card they'll never kill it with critters; and you can say nearly the same things for the orb: just sit there and wait, and your opponent will lose (if you rpotect the orb and tap its permanent, or make him tap them)... wow, what a game... it's my opinion, not an offense, but that's not much a fun card... when I'm milled away by a hair strung koto (super difficult - you must be a crazy master of magic to win wih that), by a wheel and deal or tunnel vision combo (cruel), by a barbed shocker/boomerang combo i say "wow, that was fun, i like that deck, it's nice, original and you have to be good to play and win with those crappy cards! but when i lose to a mesmeric orb-blessing combo i think: ok, i've already seen this thing, bye; or Ok, you are winning, but don't pretend to be much better than that silhana-moldervine cloak players; or, the third possibility, Ok, you are winning, i really wait to sideboard so i put in my three geas blessing...
Ehy, i repeat, the deck is nice and it's "a bit" original, and i like your article, but IMHO it is simply a control deck without any fun (except for you that win :) ).
Hope you won't be offended, and really hope to read other articles by you!
I don't think you should cut anybody slack for spelling errors these days. We've come a long way from looking up words in the dictionary. He really didn't have any major blunders though.
A quick paste into Word only revealed on a few the highlighted the importance of proofreading outside of Word.
no offense, but i've seen you misspell literally almost hundreds of words in your articles. you always judge everyone's articles as if yours are some kind of masterpiece. give the guy a break, would you? i thought his article was cool.
Should'nt of been any spelling errors. I did a spelling check multiple times. As far as the Grammer, well I did read it over and thought I caught all the issues, but I guess I missed a few.
I play this game frequantly and I find it quite fun...I don't see what you all mean.
Trying out my firecat blitz idea seems to be a good fit
I would possibly try firecat blitz if the deck racks up just a few lands you can blitz some 4/4's in the opponents face
MTGO Traders said the spacing in comments was fixed.
Record timing to my second post, too, thank you very much.
Sadly, I don't have a lot of useful information to add to this article. Extended isn't really my thing.
I'm glad you're paying attention. You are correct in that there are 16 Myojin listed, 4 short of a Spirit tribal. You'll also note that, under the 'Divine Foliage' heading, there are 4 Verdant Eidolons, bringing us up to the 20 spirits we need.
I was mainly just wanting to test out the bold/underline heh.
As an aside, I find it amusing that the PureMTGO card graphics display Ekundu Cyclops as a Cyclops and Hulking Cyclops as a Giant. One of the clearest advantages of the online over the paper game is the cards of whatever version always being up to date with the latest errata.
Uhm, I didn't name him simply because I wasn't able to ask his permission to do so before he left.
I didn't want to stalk him ;-)
Besides, the replay is gone, and I didn't write his name down.. *cough*
Please tell us who he is!
I never thought about that one, simply because I never owned or played that one.
Well, the only downside with him would be that the deck must be completly rebuild to work with him, since it won't reach threshold fast enough in this version.
Good old Power Conduit. A mainstay in my Phoenix deck, interesting take in removing age counters. Primal Forcemage deck on the cheap is quite impressive, though I might like to point out a nice little Torment uncommon, Centaur Chieftain, one of the few pre-PLC green cards with haste, with a great mini-overrun threshold kicker.
Hulking Cyclops is a cyclops.. it was errataed to be a cyclops, just check http://gatherer.wizards.com
Not offended. not everyone is going to like my articles. Its all good. Hope you like the enxt one.
Ah, the Visions ones were. Sorry, I missed that line.
One problem: Hulking Cyclops isn't actually a Cyclops, he's a Giant. :(
seriously guys, who cares about a few spelling errors? cool article!
Constant quality is one of your best points, and I liked to lose versus the cyclops one, even when I was pretty short on mana. Kavus.. well, I was going to build that one myself as soon as possible Flying blue fat is always apealing, too. .
Hi, nice article. I don't think grammar errors are so terrible, i think the contents of the article are the biggest problem: the deck is nice and cool, but i don't think it is really a fun deck; it abuses one of the most known comboes of mtgo and two ultra powerful rare cards: the zombie is playable almost with everything, destroy something, mill someone, make someone discard... no way, if they has not a removal card they'll never kill it with critters; and you can say nearly the same things for the orb: just sit there and wait, and your opponent will lose (if you rpotect the orb and tap its permanent, or make him tap them)... wow, what a game... it's my opinion, not an offense, but that's not much a fun card... when I'm milled away by a hair strung koto (super difficult - you must be a crazy master of magic to win wih that), by a wheel and deal or tunnel vision combo (cruel), by a barbed shocker/boomerang combo i say "wow, that was fun, i like that deck, it's nice, original and you have to be good to play and win with those crappy cards! but when i lose to a mesmeric orb-blessing combo i think: ok, i've already seen this thing, bye; or Ok, you are winning, but don't pretend to be much better than that silhana-moldervine cloak players; or, the third possibility, Ok, you are winning, i really wait to sideboard so i put in my three geas blessing...
Ehy, i repeat, the deck is nice and it's "a bit" original, and i like your article, but IMHO it is simply a control deck without any fun (except for you that win :) ).
Hope you won't be offended, and really hope to read other articles by you!
wut does grammer or spelling have anything to do with magic unless ur using the search engine
I don't think you should cut anybody slack for spelling errors these days. We've come a long way from looking up words in the dictionary. He really didn't have any major blunders though.
A quick paste into Word only revealed on a few the highlighted the importance of proofreading outside of Word.
segue not segway
furom?
un tap
no offense, but i've seen you misspell literally almost hundreds of words in your articles. you always judge everyone's articles as if yours are some kind of masterpiece. give the guy a break, would you? i thought his article was cool.
Is there an echo in here?
Imp. I appreciate it, and I will probably be doing that. Thanks.
Conceptually, a solid debut article. If you want help or advice with proofreading, let me know.
Should'nt of been any spelling errors. I did a spelling check multiple times. As far as the Grammer, well I did read it over and thought I caught all the issues, but I guess I missed a few.